whEn pEoplE are compEllEd to rEly on nothingnEss

Choose and conjugate a verb: we'll do
Add a politician
Place him in front of a television camera
Give him a microphone

Ask him to compose some sentences using the verb to do.
You are unable to stop him!

Well, ask him to explain when and in which occasions he formerly did what he said.
Silence... a long silence!

The answer will be: "we look to the future, we work on the future, we construct the future!"

Pity!
In your mind will resound "what future! we need to take possession of the present!"

ONE leader is few, TWO are too many

It is true if we contextualize the statement looking at the Italian political situation.

If we look at Democratic Party it is really so because there are more than two leaders, unfortunately!

If we look at 5 Stars Movement it is quite true because Grillo and Casaleggio are two leaders but they weigh as a only one dictator.

If we look at PDL  it is absolutely true because, at this moment, Berlusconi is the only leader but without a credible successor, so one's is few!

Maybe it's better to close the eyes...

raZor edge of Politics

How to decide to no decide, simply:

• pushing the others to do the first move

• communicating to their followers that they sustain the President's choice while in secret they're negotiating with the other factions about how to divide the seats of power

• or closing towards every proposal because "they" want to rule the world

Meanwhile the Country goes to drift!

Can a party that represents only the 20% of the populations  blackmail the Parliament affirming that they would accept only a Govern leaded by they themselves?

Obviously Yes, in a dictorial regime!

concePt zeRo

tabula rasa
"blank slate" is the simplification of the actual italian political situation

such as

facere de necessitate virtùtem
"make a virtue out of necessity" is the favourite maxim of our President

such as

homo homini lupus
"man is a wolf to another man" is the lex (non-electoral) that regulates our Parliament

the tiDy strEEt of PoliticS

Politic agorà isn't an open place in which is simple to access and move.
We can describe it as a long corridor full fill by doors, every door conduces to the partial solution of a problem.
The serious thing is that to open the door you have to pay a duty, a concession to the owner, but if you have to open many doors to solve the problem maybe you will finish your resources before to close the last door...
Another thing very heavy to accept is that after the opening of a door you can discover to be gone back to the starting point (snakes and ladders!).
This only to solve a single problem, now think about the complexity management of the 'Public Thing' ...
Here why every politician is become expert cat burglar.
The solution? Remove the doors ...

a SmeLLy jOb

To be able to climb a cumulus rubbish it doesn't help a good rope,
but hold one's nose well close.

RaiSe the BaR

To manage a team composed by professionals is necessary to give them great motivation.

Everyone must feel important and identify by precision their role and the expected results.

The very important think is using the communication tools to keep under pressure the team.

 

If the attention or interest will go down you'll have to raise the bar to keep higher the unit and the spirit team.

 

So Grillo docet ...

wiN-Win: false theOry ...

It doesn't exist a win-win situation between two adversaries but only one winner or two losers.

You have to choose

 if

you want to be

winner or loser!

 

How can do it?

If you are sure to win, go on  straigth to the goal but always  thinking how your adversary could turn the situation around to his favour!
If you are sure that you can't have any chances to win the exit way is to involve another player... the third part can be the critical solution to rock the boat to your favour!